How can advancements meant to connect and inform be twisted into instruments of oppression? In our hyper-connected, digital age, where billions are just a click away, a chilling paradox emerges. While technology has revolutionized communication and brought unprecedented access to information, it has also become a potent weapon in the hands of religious persecutors.
Persecution against Christians involves any hostility faced due to their faith. Digital persecution is a specific form of this, using technology to harass, intimidate, or discriminate against individuals based on their religion.
According to Open Doors, an organization working with persecuted Christians, approximately 365 million Christians endure high or extreme levels of persecution and discrimination. To put this into perspective, that is one in seven Christians in more than 70 countries. Digital persecution has emerged as a potent tool, exacerbating this issue by expanding its reach and intensity.
Government surveillance and cyber tools
Recent years have seen a rapid growth in surveillance technology as governments acquire increasingly sophisticated tools to monitor their citizens.
Governments are increasingly capable of mass surveillance.
Beyond traditional surveillance targeting specific individuals, governments are increasingly capable of mass surveillance, monitoring entire populations. Religious minorities in authoritarian states are particularly vulnerable to both forms of invasive oversight. As a result, state surveillance and data privacy have emerged as critical global issues.
Governments often employ extensive cyber tools to infiltrate private communications, spread disinformation, and identify individuals for targeted persecution. This largely unchecked surveillance not only erodes privacy but also creates a climate of fear and intimidation, particularly for vulnerable groups.
Furthermore, cyber tools enable authorities to sow distrust within religious communities. By planting false information and rumors, they can create rifts that weaken the solidarity of these groups.
Online harassment often escalates to physical violence. Even individuals without violent intent can be drawn into real-world violence due to algorithms that amplify extremist content. By understanding persecution tactics and critically evaluating online information, we can foster a safer digital landscape for all
The role of artificial intelligence
Using artificial intelligence to identify and censor religious expressions poses another significant threat. Advanced algorithms scan social media posts, online forums, and even private messages for keywords or phrases indicative of religious content. This technology enables governments and other entities to monitor and censor religious expressions with incredible accuracy and speed.
Governments increase surveillance through AI.
Governments increase surveillance through AI, making it nearly impossible for religious minorities to freely practice their faith online. This level of scrutiny extends to encrypted communications, where algorithms can sometimes break through protective layers to access private conversations.
Conclusion
In this ever-evolving digital age, the responsibility falls on both individuals and institutions to navigate these challenges wisely. Surveillance might be pervasive, but so too is the opportunity to build networks of support and resistance against persecution. As we look forward, the path to safeguarding religious freedom will undoubtedly require a balanced and proactive approach.
Ultimately, the ongoing battle between the oppressive use of technology and its liberating potential underscores the need for vigilance, advocacy, and a commitment to the fundamental rights of all individuals to worship freely.
The future of religious freedom in a digital world depends on how we choose to wield these powerful tools.
Stefan van der Berg serves at dia-LOGOS, a team of church consultants, and is a sought-after public speaker, helping churches and organizations develop strategic plans for their missions. He lives in South Africa.
The views expressed in this or any other opinion article do not necessarily reflect the views of Christian Daily International.
